Bibliography
Secondary Literature: Book Reviews (C)
Campbell J. 2005. Review of McDermott, Skrupskelis and Berkekey's The correspondence of William James, vols 1-12. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41(3): 703-713.
Campbell J. 2006. Reviews of Taylor's Varieties of religion today: William James revisited, Ferrari's The varieties of religious experience: centenary essays, and Proudfoot's William James and a science of religions: reexperiencing The varieties of religious experience. Metaphilosophy 37(1): 130-135.
Capps J. 2002. Review of Heft's Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38(3): 468-472.
Charles R. 2001. Making the world safe from truth. [Review of Menand's The Metaphysical Club: a story of ideas in America]. Christian Science Monitor (Eastern Edition) 93(145): 17.
Chemero A. 2003. Radical empiricism through the ages. [Review of Heft's Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism]. PsycCRITIQUES 48(1).
Chessick R. 2001. Review of Menand's The Metaphysical Club: a story of ideas in America. American Journal of Psychiatry 158(12): 2100-2103.
Christie D. 2001. Review of Brown's William James on radical empiricism and religion. Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries 38(6): 1094.
Christie D. 2001. Review of Oliver's William James's 'springs of delight'. Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries 38(11-12): 1973-1974.
Christie D. 2003. Review of Taylor's Varieties of religion today: William James revisited. Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries 40(5): 842.
Clausen C. 2001. The liberal dilemma. [Review of Menand's The Metaphysical Club: a story of ideas in America]. New Leader 84(3): 25-27.
Cohen P. 2006, August 14. Call it crazy? Seeking science in seance. [Review of Blum's Ghost hunters: William James and the search for scientific proof of life after death]. New York Times:
E8. [FULL TEXT]
Colapiertro VM. 2007. Review of Taylor's Varieties of religion today: William James revisited. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81(1): 156-160.
Cooper W. 2006. Review of Goodman's Wittgenstein and William James. Metaphilosophy 37(2): 289-294.
Costall A. 2003. Review of Heft's Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 39(3): 320-322.
Courville ME. 2004. Review of Taylor's Varieties of religion today: William James revisited. Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 33(1): 134-135.
Crabtree A. 2000. Review of Reed's From soul to mind: the emergence of psychology from Erasmus Darwin to William James. Isis 91(4): 801.
Cramer MD. 2006. Review of Blum's Ghost hunters: William James and the search for scientific proof of life after death. Library Journal 131(12): 103.
Croce PJ. 2000. Review of Simon's Genuine reality: a life of William James. Isis 91(1): 174-175.
Croce PJ. 2002. Review of Lamberth's William James and the metaphysics of experience. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51(1): 65-67.
Croce PJ. 2002. A useful eccentricity: William James's engagement with science. [Review of McDermott, Skrupskelis and Berkeley's The correspondence of William James, vols 1-9]. Isis 93(2): 272-276.
Croce PJ. 2005. Review of Proudfoot's William James and a science of religions. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41(4): 845-851.
Croce PJ. 2007. Review of Machado's Brazil through the eyes of William James: letters, diaries, and drawings, 1865-1866. Journal of the History of Biology 40(3): 582-584.
Croce PJ. 2009. Review of Fisher's House of wits: an intimate portrait of the James family. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 45(3): 288-290.
Crosby DA. 2000. Review of Lamberth's William James and the metaphysics of experience. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 21(2): 201-207.
Curley AJ. 2002. Review of Taylor's Varieties of religion today: William James revisited. Library Journal 127(2): 108.